<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>U.S. &#187; Kate Pickert &#124; TIME.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nation.time.com/author/katepickert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nation.time.com</link>
	<description>News, Headlines, Stories, Video from Around the Nation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:05:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='nation.time.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://nation.time.com/osd.xml" title="U.S." />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://nation.time.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Lessons from Angelina: The Tricky Calculus of Cancer Testing</title>
		<link>http://nation.time.com/2013/05/15/lessons-from-angelina-the-tricky-calculus-of-cancer-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://nation.time.com/2013/05/15/lessons-from-angelina-the-tricky-calculus-of-cancer-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 09:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Pickert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nation.time.com/?p=120597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Angelina Jolie deserves praise for her decision to reveal in a New York Times op-ed that she recently underwent a preventive double mastectomy. She had the surgery after discovering she carried a gene mutation that gave her a high risk of developing breast and ovarian cancers. As an engaged and informed patient taking control over her own health, Jolie is a role model. But it would be a mistake to view the actress’s experience as instructive for most women who live in fear of developing breast cancer, a disease that claims the lives of some 40,000 American women every year. Jolie’s disclosure comes at a time when more and more breast cancer patients who don&#8217;t have a high genetic risk factor are opting for single or double mastectomies, even though those surgeries don’t necessarily increase their chances of survival. It also comes after decades of breast cancer awareness campaigns have heightened anxiety of the disease to unprecedented levels. Otis Brawley, chief medical officer for the American Cancer Society, salutes Jolie for her carefully and responsibly worded essay, but fears other American women may not proceed with the same caution. He says one thought that came to mind as he read Jolie&#8217;s essay, was &#8220;&#8216;Oh no, there&#8217;s going to be a rush to get this screening test that’s really going to be a bad thing for a lot of people.&#8217;&#8221; (MORE: Angelina Jolie’s Double Mastectomy: It’s Not the Only Option) Women with a family history of early onset ovarian or breast cancers, with close family members who&#8217;ve developed such cancers or who&#8217;ve already tested positive for the mutation affecting Jolie, known as the BRCA gene, should talk to their doctor and possibly a genetic counselor about undergoing testing. (Jolie was prompted to do so after her mother died of ovarian cancer at 56.) The mutation means a woman is far more likely to develop breast cancer—Jolie says her doctors estimated she had an 87% chance of getting breast cancer and a 50% chance of getting ovarian cancer, which is also linked to BRCA<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nation.time.com&#038;blog=20157722&#038;post=120597&#038;subd=timemilitary&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nation.time.com/2013/05/15/lessons-from-angelina-the-tricky-calculus-of-cancer-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	<primary_category>Health Care</primary_category><primary_category_link>http://nation.time.com/category/health-care-2/</primary_category_link><featured_image>http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/h_50827961.jpg?w=240</featured_image>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/h_50827961.jpg?w=240" />
		<media:content url="http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/h_50827961.jpg?w=240" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Angelina Jolie, arriving to the G8 Foreign Ministers summit in London, on April 11, 2013.</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40234a6843419b1a17b2c08b6848561?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">katepickert</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Challenge of Proving Fetal Homicide in the Cleveland Kidnapping Case</title>
		<link>http://nation.time.com/2013/05/09/the-challenge-of-proving-fetal-homicide-in-the-cleveland-kidnapping-case/</link>
		<comments>http://nation.time.com/2013/05/09/the-challenge-of-proving-fetal-homicide-in-the-cleveland-kidnapping-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 19:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Pickert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nation.time.com/?p=119994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Correction Appended: May 9, 2013 If the man accused of imprisoning three women for a decade inside his Cleveland home is convicted of the charges filed against him, it seems unlikely he will ever be released from prison. This week, prosecutors charged Ariel Castro with four counts of kidnapping and three counts of rape. Under Ohio law, each felony charge leveled against him carries a sentence of three to 11 years. He&#8217;s now being held on $8 million bond. Some may be wondering why Castro wasn’t also charged with homicide. One of his victims, Michelle Knight, reportedly told investigators she became pregnant five times while in captivity and that Castro beat and starved her each time until she miscarried. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, Ohio is one of at least 38 states whose homicide statute applies to the killing of unborn fetuses and one of at least 23 states that apply this statute to the earliest stages of pregnancy. Building a fetal-homicide case against Castro could be very difficult, although Cuyahoga County prosecutor Tim McGinty said Thursday that his office is considering it, which could mean seeking the death penalty. Proving such a case, according to Katherine Hunt Federle, a criminal-law professor at Ohio State University, typically requires expert medical testimony based on physical examinations of the woman who miscarried and the fetus itself. Prosecutors would have to first prove that the pregnancies occurred and then that Castro’s action caused them to end in miscarriage. “There is generally a rule that you have to have some evidence that a homicide was committed, so the mere testimony of the women may not be sufficient,” says Federle. “If you think about people who have been kidnapped or placed under stress, depending on what’s happened to them, their psychological states may be poor. Repeated interviews might enable a defense lawyer down the road to suggest that these women may not have actually recalled this information, that it was suggested to them. Everybody wants to be careful about this because their key<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nation.time.com&#038;blog=20157722&#038;post=119994&#038;subd=timemilitary&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nation.time.com/2013/05/09/the-challenge-of-proving-fetal-homicide-in-the-cleveland-kidnapping-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<primary_category>Crime</primary_category><primary_category_link>http://nation.time.com/category/crime-2/</primary_category_link><featured_image>http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/usn-cleveland-court-130509.jpg?w=240</featured_image>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/usn-cleveland-court-130509.jpg?w=240" />
		<media:content url="http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/usn-cleveland-court-130509.jpg?w=240" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Ariel Castro is arraigned at Cleveland Municipal Court for the kidnapping of three women in Cleveland, May 9, 2013.</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40234a6843419b1a17b2c08b6848561?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">katepickert</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Things the Oregon Medicaid Study Tells Us About American Health Care</title>
		<link>http://nation.time.com/2013/05/02/5-things-the-oregon-medicaid-study-tells-us-about-american-health-care/</link>
		<comments>http://nation.time.com/2013/05/02/5-things-the-oregon-medicaid-study-tells-us-about-american-health-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 20:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Pickert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nation.time.com/?p=118878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among all the criticisms of President Obama&#8217;s health care reform law, the most salient may be that the Affordable Care Act focuses on access to insurance at the expense of cost and quality care. A new set of results from a study on Oregon’s Medicaid program supports this critique and offers a window into the broader shortcomings of the U.S. health care system. The results, published this week in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that in a randomized controlled trial, the health of Oregonians on Medicaid did not differ significantly from a control group left off the rolls of the public insurance program. Researchers looked at the health of some 12,000 people, measuring their cholesterol and blood-sugar levels, among other factors. The results also indicated that Medicaid enrollees were less prone to depression, less likely to incur catastrophic out-of-pocket health expenses and much more frequent users of health care services. (Study participants were gathered from a group of Oregon residents eligible for Medicaid and put on a waiting list for the program. Those able to enroll in Medicaid were chosen by lottery and compared against those left on the waiting list.) These findings can tell us many things about American health care. Here are a few: Preventive care isn’t all it&#8217;s cracked up to be. The Oregon study found that people on Medicaid got more preventive care — including mammograms, flu shots and Pap smears — than those in the uninsured control group. While it might seem logical that heading off and identifying potential health problems early through screening tests and doctor visits will lead to faster, cheaper treatment, the truth is much more complicated. Prevention as a population-based health strategy saves money only if the savings generated by preventing or catching health problems early in some people outweighs the cost of all the doctor visits and screening tests performed on people who are well and don’t need treatment. In addition, some screening tests — particularly those intended to catch certain cancers early — lead to lots of unnecessary<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nation.time.com&#038;blog=20157722&#038;post=118878&#038;subd=timemilitary&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nation.time.com/2013/05/02/5-things-the-oregon-medicaid-study-tells-us-about-american-health-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	<primary_category>Health Care</primary_category><primary_category_link>http://nation.time.com/category/health-care-2/</primary_category_link><featured_image>http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/ap120618122531-e1367527314211.jpg?w=240</featured_image>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/ap120618122531-e1367527314211.jpg?w=240" />
		<media:content url="http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/ap120618122531-e1367527314211.jpg?w=240" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Oregon Health Law Court</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40234a6843419b1a17b2c08b6848561?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">katepickert</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside Reddit&#8217;s Hunt for the Boston Bombers</title>
		<link>http://nation.time.com/2013/04/23/inside-reddits-hunt-for-the-boston-bombers/</link>
		<comments>http://nation.time.com/2013/04/23/inside-reddits-hunt-for-the-boston-bombers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Pickert / Watertown, Mass., and Adam Sorensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nation.time.com/?p=117806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Cheetham looks like a Hollywood rendition of a Reddit user. The 19-year-old student at Emerson College in Boston is lean and youthful, dressed in all black with glasses with a skull earring in his left ear. His companion on this Friday afternoon looks less the part: Luke, a 37-year-old entrepreneur from New York who spoke to TIME on the condition that his last name not appear in print because he was worried it might affect his businesses, is stubbled, wearing corduroys and a plaid, untucked button-down. The unlikely duo are stationed in a parking lot across the street from the Arsenal Mall in Watertown, Mass., where a fleet of news trucks and a large crowd of reporters have gathered to cover the search for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the second suspect in the Boston Marathon bombing. Cheetham and Luke appear to be living out of Luke’s car — what Cheetham calls their “mobile command center” — a navy blue minivan carpeted in crumbs, a bag of clothes, a cigarette-lighter-powered spotlight, a metal baseball bat (just in case) and a wirelessly connected laptop. With a wide swath of Watertown on lockdown, police probably wouldn’t have let them in if it weren’t for one thing: they were on the scene early. Cheetham and Luke are self-deputized reporters for Reddit, the massive user-generated news site and “front page of the Internet” that played a central role in the media maelstrom that engulfed last week’s search for those who detonated two bombs at the Boston marathon. Both men say they were near the finish line when the explosions happened and began following the investigation online, where they listened to Boston police scanners and posted information to the now defunct FindBostonBombers section of Reddit. When the bombing suspects, eventually identified as Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and his older brother Tamerlan, cut a violent path through Watertown late Thursday, Cheetham and Luke separately struck out into the night to follow the manhunt. They decided to team up after meeting by chance in the early hours of Friday morning at<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nation.time.com&#038;blog=20157722&#038;post=117806&#038;subd=timemilitary&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nation.time.com/2013/04/23/inside-reddits-hunt-for-the-boston-bombers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<primary_category>Crime</primary_category><primary_category_link>http://nation.time.com/category/crime-2/</primary_category_link><featured_image>http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/fa57028d9bb942ba8692ce3205018feb-0.jpg?w=240</featured_image>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/fa57028d9bb942ba8692ce3205018feb-0.jpg?w=240" />
		<media:content url="http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/fa57028d9bb942ba8692ce3205018feb-0.jpg?w=240" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Brothers</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40234a6843419b1a17b2c08b6848561?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">katepickert</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What’s Wrong with the Violence Against Women Act?</title>
		<link>http://nation.time.com/2013/02/27/whats-wrong-with-the-violence-against-women-act/</link>
		<comments>http://nation.time.com/2013/02/27/whats-wrong-with-the-violence-against-women-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Pickert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nation.time.com/?p=108839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Congress passed the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) in 1994, it was a landmark in federally recognizing the scourge of domestic violence. It also brought about a very practical change, meant to address the problem of cops treating such cases as private family matters instead of serious crimes. With grant funding as reward and with the backing of many leaders in the battered women’s movement, VAWA encouraged states to adopt mandatory arrest policies that allowed domestic violence cases to move forward without the cooperation of victims. Eighteen years later, with a reauthorization of VAWA now stalled on Capitol Hill, a vocal group of researchers and advocates are questioning whether VAWA’s original intent—to make law enforcement the primary tool to stop domestic violence—was the right approach. “VAWA’s focus on law enforcement reduces the really more complicated thing of violence against women to be a problem of the law,” says Beth E. Richie, a sociologist and professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago who studies violence against women. “And it’s not just a problem of the law.” VAWA has increased prosecution rates of domestic violence cases, but there is little conclusive evidence that it has significantly reduced the incidence of violence. According to the Department of Justice (DOJ), the rate of intimate partner violence dropped 64% between 1994 and 2010, a drop pro-VAWA policymakers largely attribute to the law. But this decrease happened at the same time violent crime as a whole fell dramatically nationwide, making it hard to know whether a drop in domestic violence might have happened without the policies adopted under VAWA. (PHOTOS: Photographer as Witness: A Portrait of Domestic Violence) Domestic violence is still a severely under-reported crime and some critics say mandatory arrest policies have exacerbated this problem. These policies, which existed in some states before VAWA but became more common after early versions of VAWA encouraged them, require police officers responding to domestic violence calls to arrest alleged abusers if there is probable cause to believe assaults have taken place. The intent of these<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nation.time.com&#038;blog=20157722&#038;post=108839&#038;subd=timemilitary&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nation.time.com/2013/02/27/whats-wrong-with-the-violence-against-women-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	<primary_category>National</primary_category><primary_category_link>http://nation.time.com/category/national/</primary_category_link><featured_image>http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/domestic_violence_0227.jpg?w=240</featured_image>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/domestic_violence_0227.jpg?w=240" />
		<media:content url="http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/domestic_violence_0227.jpg?w=240" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Domestic Violence</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40234a6843419b1a17b2c08b6848561?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">katepickert</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacare and GOP Governors – Is This a Tipping Point?</title>
		<link>http://swampland.time.com/2013/02/06/obamacare-and-gop-governors-is-this-a-tipping-point/</link>
		<comments>http://swampland.time.com/2013/02/06/obamacare-and-gop-governors-is-this-a-tipping-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Pickert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nation.time.com/?p=105280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nation.time.com&#038;blog=20157722&#038;post=105280&#038;subd=timemilitary&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://swampland.time.com/2013/02/06/obamacare-and-gop-governors-is-this-a-tipping-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<primary_category>National</primary_category><primary_category_link>http://nation.time.com/category/national/</primary_category_link>
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40234a6843419b1a17b2c08b6848561?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">katepickert</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>40 Years After Roe: Inside North Dakota&#8217;s Only Abortion Clinic</title>
		<link>http://nation.time.com/2013/01/22/40-years-after-roe-inside-north-dakotas-only-abortion-clinic/</link>
		<comments>http://nation.time.com/2013/01/22/40-years-after-roe-inside-north-dakotas-only-abortion-clinic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Pickert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nation.time.com/?p=102124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[January 22, 2013 marks the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court decision that made access to abortion a constitutionally protected right. Instead of celebrating this milestone, however, abortion rights activists find themselves on the defensive. In the four decades since the high court’s historic ruling, pro-choice activists have been steadily losing ground to their pro-life opponents. The result is that in many parts of the country today, it is harder to access abortion services than at any time since Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973. Pro-life activists have pursued a multi-pronged strategy to reduce the number of abortion providers in the U.S. and make it more difficult and more expensive for women to access the procedure.  In 2008, there were 38% fewer abortion providers in the U.S. than in 1982. Today, there are four states that have just a single surgical abortion provider: North Dakota, South Dakota, Arkansas and Mississippi. The facility featured in these photographs, the Red River Women’s Clinic in Fargo, ND, is one such provider. Doctors who work at the clinic perform 20 to 25 abortions every week and women travel to Red River from across North Dakota, nearby Minnesota and Canada. Photographer Jamie Chung traveled to Fargo in late 2012 as part of a TIME cover story documenting the state of abortion rights in America. His photographs offer a rare glimpse at the delivery of abortion services inside a clinic, 40 years after Roe v. Wade.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nation.time.com&#038;blog=20157722&#038;post=102124&#038;subd=timemilitary&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nation.time.com/2013/01/22/40-years-after-roe-inside-north-dakotas-only-abortion-clinic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<primary_category>National</primary_category><primary_category_link>http://nation.time.com/category/national/</primary_category_link><featured_image>http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/02120925_time_clinic_day2-0395-2.jpg?w=240</featured_image>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/02120925_time_clinic_day2-0395-2.jpg?w=240" />
		<media:content url="http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/02120925_time_clinic_day2-0395-2.jpg?w=240" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">02120925_time_clinic_day2 0395 2</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40234a6843419b1a17b2c08b6848561?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">katepickert</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has the Fight for Abortion Rights Been Lost?</title>
		<link>http://www.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,2132761,00.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,2132761,00.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Pickert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Women's Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nation.time.com/?p=100511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nation.time.com&#038;blog=20157722&#038;post=100511&#038;subd=timemilitary&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,2132761,00.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<primary_category>Women&#039;s Issues</primary_category><primary_category_link>http://nation.time.com/category/womens-issues/</primary_category_link><featured_image>http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/360_wprochoice_0114.jpg?w=240</featured_image>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/360_wprochoice_0114.jpg?w=240" />
		<media:content url="http://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/360_wprochoice_0114.jpg?w=240" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">120924_Time_Clinic_Day 1 00.JPG</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40234a6843419b1a17b2c08b6848561?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">katepickert</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waste or Haste? Electronic Health Record Payments Under Scrutiny</title>
		<link>http://swampland.time.com/2012/11/29/waste-or-haste-electronic-health-record-payments-under-scrutiny/#ixzz2E06gxGap</link>
		<comments>http://swampland.time.com/2012/11/29/waste-or-haste-electronic-health-record-payments-under-scrutiny/#ixzz2E06gxGap#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Pickert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nation.time.com/?p=96723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nation.time.com&#038;blog=20157722&#038;post=96723&#038;subd=timemilitary&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://swampland.time.com/2012/11/29/waste-or-haste-electronic-health-record-payments-under-scrutiny/#ixzz2E06gxGap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<primary_category>National</primary_category><primary_category_link>http://nation.time.com/category/national/</primary_category_link>
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d40234a6843419b1a17b2c08b6848561?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">katepickert</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
