Why San Francisco May Ban Certain Butterflies

The city is weighing the nation's first ban on releasing commercially bred species

  • Share
  • Read Later
Kerri Wile

A newly emerged monarch butterfly alights on a branch.

San Francisco is often on the cutting edge—especially when it comes to banning things. In recent years, the city became the first major metro to outlaw plastic bags, unsolicited phone books and toys in fast food meals. Now, following a meeting of the city’s environmental commission this week, it seems butterflies may be next.

The seven-member Commission on the Environment heard testimony about the dangers of releasing commercially bred butterflies into the wild, something that people may do to celebrate weddings or loved ones at funerals, as well as raise awareness about diseases like breast cancer.

The commission called on Amber Hasselbring, executive director of nonprofit ecology organization Nature in the City, to talk about the effects on the butterflies themselves. She says that what may seem like a beautiful gesture can leave the animals at an arbitrary spot where they’ll never “find the right conditions to support the rest of their life cycle.” Even if they do, the butterflies may spread diseases or genetic weaknesses they have as the result of being “mass produced,” she says.

Sending farm-bred beauties into the air may also interfere with observation of naturally occurring populations and their migration patterns, Hasselbring says. In Santa Cruz’ Natural Bridges State Beach, for instance, park officials are currently counting the masses of monarch butterflies that are wintering there during an annual journey south.

Representatives from the commercial butterfly industry have scoffed at the potential ban, saying that their sales actually bolster the populations and awareness of the insects. “People are just going to order butterflies anyway,” Dale McClung, a spokesman for the International Butterfly Breeders Association, told the San Francisco Examiner, emphasizing that a ban would be difficult to enforce.

Advocates of a ban also feel a moral opposition to any business that breeds animals and ships them off to be used in ceremonies, whether doves or butterflies or any other creature. Shops sell monarch butterflies “by the dozen” for prices around $85, meaning each butterfly goes for about $7. For Hasselbring, the trade amounts to the animals being “objectified and treated like party favors.” There are more “environmentally sensitive ways we can celebrate,” she says.

The United States Department of Agriculture, which oversees the exporting and importing of animals, already has some rules on the books that regulate interstate shipment of live butterflies. But if San Francisco forbids the release of all commercially raised butterflies, it will be another first in the nation. The environmental commission approved a resolution supporting a ban. To make it law, the city’s Board of Supervisors will have to consider and approve it, too.

2 comments
PaulCherubini
PaulCherubini

In this study, commercially bred monarch butterflies migrated 1,000+ miles to the overwintering sites in both California and Mexico which proved they survive well. http://www.swallowtailfarms.com/pages/educationalproducts_mms.html So because  commercially bred butterflies survive and migrate fine in the wild, banning their release is actually a form of prejudice and discrimination.  It's a great irony that a city famous for tolerance of a wild range of lifestyles, races and cultures would actually promote a novel new form of prejudice, discrimination and elitism. 


obrien.liam9
obrien.liam9

The city has done such great work restoring habitat and making things better for these creatures. It makes sense to closed down the back door exploitation of them. And considering this is the city where humans removed the first butterfly from the planet - the Xerces Blue - it seems sublimely appropriate for this new idea to come for there.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,105 other followers