Battleland

Primed and Ready: Huge Pentagon Bunker-Buster Gets Green Light For Possible Iran Mission

  • Share
  • Read Later
Air Force photo

Air Force personnel in front of a mock-up of the Massive Ordnance Penetrator at Whiteman Air Force Base, Mo., home of the nation's B-2 force that would carry the 30,000-pound bomb.

After fretting for months that a “critical part” of the world’s biggest bunker-busting bomb was flawed, the Pentagon declared last week that the mammoth blaster is at last fixed and ready for use – against Iran, or any other nation the U.S. decides is developing weapons of mass destruction deeply underground.

There’s as much psychological gamesmanship at play here as pyrotechnics, as the U.S. and Iran continue their showdown over Washington’s insistence that Tehran abandon its nuclear-weapons program, and the Iranians’ assertion that their program is only for peaceful purposes.

Make no mistake about it: the declaration that the Air Force’s Massive Ordnance Penetrator is ready for action is the latest volley in a high-stakes game that could lead to war before the year is out.

Future 30,000-pound bomb reaches mile stone

Air Force photo

A fake MOP in the fake belly of a fake B-2 bomber.

The Defense Department’s Operational Test and Evaluation office makes clear that, after more than a year of vague Pentagon-expressed concerns that there were technical problems with the MOP, the 15-ton bomb is now ready for prime time. The green light comes after a series of tests through the fall at Holloman Air Force Base and White Sands Missile Range, both in New Mexico, showed that the redesigned weapon “effectively prosecuted the targets.”

“The MOP is a GPS-guided weapon designed to reach and destroy targets located in well protected facilities,” the testing synopsis reads. “The sled test results and the additional weapon drops indicate that the weapon re-design is adequate for the successful prosecution of all of the elements of the currently defined target set.”

While no one will say so, Iran’s nuclear facility at Fordo – buried up to 80 meters beneath a mountain near the Shiite holy city of Qom, at a former missile base controlled by Iran’s unpredictable Revolutionary Guards – is at the top of that target list. And Tehran now knows it is officially vulnerable to attack.

“The warhead case is made from a special high performance steel alloy and its design allows for a large explosive payload while maintaining the integrity of the penetrator case during impact,” the test report notes. “Combatant Commanders use MOP to conduct pre-planned, day or night attacks against defended point targets vulnerable to blast and fragmentation effects and requiring significant penetration, such as hardened and deeply-buried facilities.”

Having the MOP in its quiver does two things for the U.S.: first of all, for the Iranians, it makes clear that the U.S. has a non-nuclear option to pulverize much of its nuclear-development effort – peaceful or otherwise – and delay it for years. But the neat twist is that Israel doesn’t have such a weapon, and its relatively puny 5,000-pound bunker-busters could do far less damage to Iranian targets. That, some U.S. officials say, should act as a brake on any unilateral Israeli action.

Nearly a decade ago, the Pentagon concluded that dropping its one-ton bombs on buried targets was like using a peashooter against an elephant. “Our past test experience has shown that 2,000-pound penetrators carrying 500 pounds of high explosive are relatively ineffective against tunnels, even when skipped directly into the tunnel entrance,” a 2004 report said. “Instead, several thousand pounds of high explosives coupled to the tunnel are needed to blow down blast doors and propagate a lethal air blast throughout a typical tunnel complex.”

Tehran acknowledged Fordo’s existence in 2009, once it learned the West had detected it and was ready to announce its discovery. That was about the same time the Pentagon’s Defense Threat Reduction Agency — charged with reducing the threat posed by weapons of mass destruction – was wrapping up initial tests on the MOP’s design before handing the program over to the Air Force.

The Air Force said it wanted a “Quick Reaction Capability” to “defeat a specific set of Hard and/or Deeply Buried Targets.” The weapon, the service said, would “maximize effects against Hard and/or Deeply Buried Targets (HDBTs), while minimizing time over target.” The service said it needed the weapon to meet “Urgent Operational Needs requirements” – generally a plea from a battlefield commander who doesn’t think he has the weapons he needs to accomplish a mission assigned to him.

“The system will hold at risk those highest priority assets essential to the enemy’s war-fighting ability, which are heavily defended and protected,” the Air Force said in February 2011 budget documents. It would provide “a critical global strike capability not currently met by inventory conventional weapons.”

The $15 million MOP has six times the heft of existing GBU-28 bunker busters. Glided into its destination by GPS-guided lattice-type fins, its alloy steel hull – some 80% of its weight – is designed to remain intact as it drills through rock or reinforced concrete before setting off its 5,300-pound warhead. Air Force officials say it represents a “bridge” capability between existing bunker busters and nuclear weapons themselves.

Pentagon documents detail the kind of target Fordo is believed to represent (“all data with regard to this Scenario are notional,” the government says, “and do not represent any known target”):

…the HDBT is assumed to be a tunnel complex with two portals built into the base of a granite mountain. The granite over layer is assumed to be 60 meters thick over both portals and 80 meters over the facility’s mission space. Metallic blast doors are closed and hermetically sealed at both portals. The two tunnels are assumed to be 100 feet in length with directional turns. The facility is constructed on a single level and occupies between 10,000 and 20,000 square feet.

The HDBT makes use of state-of-the-art computers and communication equipment. It is tied to the local electricity grid but has a large capacity diesel generator to produce its electricity when the need arises. The facility draws fresh water from an internal deep well. Sewage is held in holding tanks and removed periodically. All incoming air passes through state-of-the-art biological/chemical filters.

The Pentagon doesn’t have an unlimited supply of MOPs: it initially bought 20, for $314 million. The Boeing-built weapon can only be carried by the Air Force’s B-2 stealth bomber.

It’s also extremely shy: there are few photographs of the real thing. But the Air Force has released a pair of photographs of a MOP mockup. It’s a safe bet the mockup has been tweaked from the actual weapon to avoid betraying its precise design and dimensions.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta was asked about the MOP’s possible use against Iranian targets in September. “Without going into the particular capabilities we have,” Panetta told CBS, “we think we’ve got the ability to be able to strike at them effectively if we have to.”

5 comments
trhhome
trhhome

SEEMS TO ME WE DON'T HAVE TO PENETRATE ALL THAT CONCRETE AND SAND WITH A BOMB. WHY NOT JUST TAKE OUT THE FRONT AND BACK DOORS TO THE BUNKER, DISTROY ITS POWER PLANT SUPPLY. IF NO ONE CAN GET IN OR OUT WE ACCOMPLISH THE SAME OBJECTIVE.  IF THEY START TO DIG IT OUT, HIT THEM AGAIN!

DefenceToday
DefenceToday

Don't worry about Fordo, its all ready been taken out.

Don_Bacon
Don_Bacon like.author.displayName 1 Like

The whole Iran "crisis" is concocted. Iran doesn't threaten anyone. Remember Iraq, anyone? Why is battleland drinking this propaganda koolaid?

Don_Bacon
Don_Bacon

It looks like General Mattis (CENTCOM) will be replaced this Spring, which would bring congressional hearings including Iran.

Don_Bacon
Don_Bacon like.author.displayName 1 Like

“The MOP is a GPS-guided weapon designed to reach and destroy targets located in well protected facilities.”

Forget it. The MOP is good for 60 feet of concrete and the Fordo facilities are under 90 meters of rock.

"Tehran acknowledged Fordo’s existence in 2009, once it learned the West had detected it and was ready to announce its discovery."

False propaganda. Iran was not required to report a nuclear facility, as required by treaty, until it is operational.

In September 2009, Iran informed the International Atomic Energy Agency that it was constructing the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP), located near the city of Qom. In its DIQ of 10 October 2009, Iran stated that the purpose of the facility was the production of UF6 enriched up to 5% U-235, and that the facility was being built to contain 16 cascades, with a total of approximately 3000 centrifuges.

In September 2010, Iran provided the Agency with a revised DIQ in which it stated that the purpose of FFEP was to include R&D as well as the production of UF6 enriched up to 5% U-235.   Iran provided the Agency with another revised DIQ in June 2011 in which the stated purpose of FFEP was the production of UF6 enriched up to 20% U-235, as well as R&D.

 “Without going into the particular capabilities we have,” Panetta told CBS, “we think we’ve got the ability to be able to strike at them effectively if we have to.”

Iran also has abilities to strike back at the US (and Israel) in many places, afloat and ashore, and it would probably do so if the US has the folly to use the MOP. Get the hook for Uncle Leon.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,106 other followers