$59

getty

…the price of a gallon of Air Force alcohol-based jet fuel.

Makes the Navy’s use of biofuels – costing $27 a gallon and irritating Republicans on Capitol Hill no end – look like a bargain.

  • Share
  • Read Later
6 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
freefallingbomb
freefallingbomb

There is something very, veeery fishy about this whole story (I clicked on the links, too)...

All our French city buses already drive on a biofuel mix, and our trucks and agricultural tractors (heavy equipment in general), too, and it's almost as cheap as normal fuel. In Brazil biofuel is even cheaper than normal fuel, because basically they shred and stuff the whole Amazon jungle into their fuel tanks. And these are just two countries whose biofuel prices I know personally about. And I can't imagine that biofuel for U.S. civilians is that much more expensive than normal car fuel, otherwise even millionaires couldn't afford it.

Look, it's not Photoshop:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi...

Biofuel for aircraft (including for warplanes) even gets mixed with kerosene, which is one of the EARLIEST AND CHEAPEST sub-products of the very long process of oil refining = a true WASTE product!!! Take a look at this diagram and feel shocked:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi... (Do you see how extremely close jet fuel appears to the unrefined, raw crude oil on the left??)

In my conspiracy theory, these two 59-$-a-gallon-Airforce-biofuel and 27-$-a-gallon-Navy biofuel experiments were nothing but

DELIBERATE PLOTS

by the generals and admirals to turn the public opinion (you!) FIERCELY AGAINST all alternative fuels!!! Why? Because the oil industry has one of the strongest lobbies in your hopelessly corrupt country, and your generals are also completely bought by them. Just look who protested first: The stinking Repugs again! How utterly predictable...

So: Like EVERYTHING else the politicians amp; generals buy and pay for with our (tax) money, the real question that should be asked is not “how much did you pay?”, but “ HOW LITTLE COULD YOU HAVE PAID FOR IT ?” (and which white-collar thief profited again from what).

freefallingbomb
freefallingbomb

 I've been sleeping only one day over this topic and my perception of the REAL dimension of this scandal only got clearer.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

To begin with, let's follow through this clarifying logical sequence once:

1) Biofuel is not biodiesel.

2) Biofuel is always a blend of TWO different, organic fuel types:

1 x part of fossile fuel (commonly called “oil”) + 1 x part of fat-based fuel (called “biodiesel”).

3) In the civilian world, this mix (called “biofuel”) = petrodiesel + biodiesel.

4) In the military aviation world, this mix (called “biofuel”, too) = kerosene + biodiesel.

So far, so good? No objections? Ok, more:

5) The fuel which these U.S. warplanes used during their experiment

– was a kerosene-biodiesel M-I-X . At least according to the word “biofuel” incessantly used in the article above, and in its links, too.

– So: It was N-O-T PURE kerosene (= the same, cheap aviation fuel used on every other, normal flying day, sometimes also called “avgas”),

– but it was N-O-T PURE , undiluted biodiesel either.

Remember this, it was a MIX they used, called “biofuel”.

6) One gallon of pure, UNDILUTED kerosene costs only 3,6 $ .

Official proof of that information (taken from the first link in “Battleland”'s article above) : http://www.reuters.com/article...

7) But each single gallon of that kerosene-biodiesel-MIX used in the experiment costs 59 $ (= each one gallon of THE M-I-X = NOT of the undiluted kerosene and NOT of the undiluted biodiesel either) !

8) 3,6 $ (= pure kerosene's price / gallon) is MUCH cheaper than 59 $ (= that kerosene-biodiesel MIX's price / gallon used in the experiment). Agreed?

9) Final conclusion: Whatever biodiesel got splashed into the cheap, 3,6-$-/-gallon-kerosene must have been ( MUCH ! ) more expensive than 3,6 $ / gallon, to make the resulting biofuel MIX's price / gallon shoot up from 3,6 $ to a stupefying 59 $, right?

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

After this brief introduction, let me make a quick detour to an apparently secondary, technical and mathematical, completely unassuming detail that will in fact reveal you the most disturbing part of this topic: What PERCENTAGES did the U.S. Airforce use in its experimental biofuel blend for warplanes? (Trust me, in reality this is NOT about “chemistry”)

Let's assume – just for conversation's purpose – that the U.S. Airforce's blend was exactly 50 % – 50 % : Each 1 x gallon of normal aviation fuel (= pure kerosene) got mixed with 1 x gallon of pure biodiesel. “50–50”.

If normal aviation fuel (pure kerosene) costs only 3,6 $ / gallon, but the final price of that biofuel mix was a whopping 59 $ / gallon, then the OTHER HALF of that fuel blend (= the raw, pure, undiluted biodiesel) would have to cost almost twice as much: It would have to cost...

(the quickest formula for this simple case: )

( [59 – 3,6] x 2 = )

110,8 $ / gallon! But waaait, it gets far worse...

I must admit that I don't know which exact proportions the U.S. Airforce chose for its experimental kerosene-biodiesel blend, but I do know that the biofuel mix for most civilian, U.S. American land vehicles (called “B20”) isn't composed of 50 % petrodiesel amp; 50 % biodiesel, but of 80 % petrodiesel amp; O-N-L-Y 20 % biodiesel.

So, let's suppose again that that “alternative” military jet fuel consists similarly of

1) 80 % pure, cheap kerosene

and only of

2) 20 % pure, expensive biodiesel,

just like the biofuel blend for civilian U.S. vehicles does.

In this second, more realistic case, where biodiesel constitutes only 20 % = ONE FIFTH of the whole biofuel blend, the PURE , UNDILUTED BIODIESEL (= the 100 % ) would have to cost...

(new formula now: )

(20 % · ? $ ) + (80 % · 3,6 $ ) = (100 % · 59 $ )

Ergo:

(0,2 · x) + (0,8 · 3,6) = (1 · 59)

(0,2 · x) + 2,88 = 59

0,2 · x = 59 – 2,88

0,2 · x = 56,12

x = 56,12 : 0,2

x = 280,6

280,6 $ / gallon!!!

Mathematically speaking, only a price of 280,6 $ / gallon (for the 20 % of biodiesel) manages to increase the low price of the remaining 80 % of kerosene from 3,6 $ / gallon to 59 $ / gallon!!!

There is simply no other way, whatever other calculating formulas you use!

But does pure biodiesel really cost 280,6 $ / gallon? 280,6 $ for each gallon of PURE biodiesel, made of literally ROTTEN W-A-S-T-E ??? Is the raw matter for its production, U.S. American WASTE , really so unpayably precious? And the fat-based generals didn't even question this price for pure, undiluted biodiesel once when they went on to mix 20 % of it with 80 % of their dirt-cheap kerosene??? It never crossed their minds that it could contain dissolved gold or diamond dust or caviar or what, or wonder for what other reason civilian biodiesel (pure or mixed) is so incredibly cheaper than military biofuel??? And this experiment was even meant as a precautionary exercise against higher, future fuel prices?!

With such an E-X-T-R-E-M-E price for biodiesel, wouldn't it be much more profitable for the generals to hire some illegal aliens to sit in their planes and tanks and to invest their budgets only in biodiesel plantations?

“The price of biodiesel in the United States came down from an average $3.50 per US gallon ($0.92/l) in 1997 to $1.85 per US gallon ($0.49/l) in 2002.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...

As you see: PURE , undiluted biodiesel costs only 1,85 $ / gallon!!! That's almost HALF AS EXPENSIVE as dirt-cheap, pure kerosene, therefore any subsequent mixes with kerosene should even COST L-E-S-S THAN 3,6 $ , INSTEAD OF RISING from 3,6 $ to 59 $ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The price of that mix should have GONE DOWN , NOT GONE UP , as it incomprehensibly did!!!

For this estimated price (280,6 $) of ANYTHING per gallon, you can even fill your car trunk with propane bottles or welder bottles full of hydrogen or acetylene, and other, even more explosive liquids and gases, whose combustion in any engine yields infinitely more energy than one gallon of that ridiculously expensive “biodiesel” does! If I knew which telephone number to dial, I would even have rung N.A.S.A. or Rockwell to ask them how much they paid in the past for one gallon of solid rocket fuel in the Space Shuttle's two lateral, giant booster rockets – it can't possibly have been as much as 280,6 $ / gallon, and 1 gallon of that (cheaper) rocket fuel ALSO unleashes much more power in jet engines than 1 gallon of 100 % pure biodiesel ever will (or any other biofuel mix on Earth) ! And so on.

Obviously, there is N-O-O imaginable, minimally acceptable justification to pay anyone 280,6 $ / gallon instead of 1,85 $ / gallon for raw, pure, undiluted biodiesel! Not when civilians pay 1,85 $ / gallon for (100 % pure) biodiesel at the old gas station right on the other side of that airfield fence.

Crime, she said! And I always thought that such chaplinesque cases of fraud and corruption only happened in banana republics that already went completely bananas...

Let's see which other incongruencies I discover when I wake up tomorrow.

freefallingbomb
freefallingbomb

I've been sleeping only one day over this topic and my perception of the REAL dimension of this scandal only got clearer.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

To begin with, let's follow through this clarifying logical sequence once:

1) Biofuel is not biodiesel.

2) Biofuel is always a blend of TWO different, organic fuel types:

1 x part of fossile fuel (commonly called “oil”) + 1 x part of fat-based fuel (called “biodiesel”).

3) In the civilian world, this mix (called “biofuel”) = petrodiesel + biodiesel.

4) In the military aviation world, this mix (called “biofuel”, too) = kerosene + biodiesel.

So far, so good? No objections? Ok, more:

5) The fuel which these U.S. warplanes used during their experiment

– was a kerosene-biodiesel M-I-X . At least according to the word “biofuel” incessantly used in the article above, and in its links, too.

– So: It was N-O-T PURE kerosene (= the same, cheap aviation fuel used on every other, normal flying day, sometimes also called “avgas”),

– but it was N-O-T PURE , undiluted biodiesel either.

Remember this, it was a MIX they used, called “biofuel”.

6) One gallon of pure, UNDILUTED kerosene costs only 3,6 $ .

Official proof of that information (taken from the first link in “Battleland”'s article above) : http://www.reuters.com/article...

7) But each single gallon of that kerosene-biodiesel-MIX used in the experiment costs 59 $ (= each one gallon of THE M-I-X = NOT of the undiluted kerosene and NOT of the undiluted biodiesel either) !

8) 3,6 $ (= pure kerosene's price / gallon) is MUCH cheaper than 59 $ (= that kerosene-biodiesel MIX's price / gallon used in the experiment). Agreed?

9) Final conclusion: Whatever biodiesel got splashed into the cheap, 3,6-$-/-gallon-kerosene must have been ( MUCH ! ) more expensive than 3,6 $ / gallon, to make the resulting biofuel MIX's price / gallon shoot up from 3,6 $ to a stupefying 59 $, right?

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

After this brief introduction, let me make a quick detour to an apparently secondary, technical and mathematical, completely unassuming detail that will in fact reveal you the most disturbing part of this topic: What PERCENTAGES did the U.S. Airforce use in its experimental biofuel blend for warplanes? (Trust me, in reality this is NOT about “chemistry”)

Let's assume – just for conversation's purpose – that the U.S. Airforce's blend was exactly 50 % – 50 % : Each 1 x gallon of normal aviation fuel (= pure kerosene) got mixed with 1 x gallon of pure biodiesel. “50–50”.

If normal aviation fuel (pure kerosene) costs only 3,6 $ / gallon, but the final price of that biofuel mix was a whopping 59 $ / gallon, then the OTHER HALF of that fuel blend (= the raw, pure, undiluted biodiesel) would have to cost almost twice as much: It would have to cost...

(the quickest formula for this simple case: )

( [59 – 3,6] x 2 = )

110,8 $ / gallon! But waaait, it gets far worse...

I must admit that I don't know which exact proportions the U.S. Airforce chose for its experimental kerosene-biodiesel blend, but I do know that the biofuel mix for most civilian, U.S. American land vehicles (called “B20”) isn't composed of 50 % petrodiesel amp; 50 % biodiesel, but of 80 % petrodiesel amp; O-N-L-Y 20 % biodiesel.

So, let's suppose again that that “alternative” military jet fuel consists similarly of

1) 80 % pure, cheap kerosene

and only of

2) 20 % pure, expensive biodiesel,

just like the biofuel blend for civilian U.S. vehicles does.

In this second, more realistic case, where biodiesel constitutes only 20 % = ONE FIFTH of the whole biofuel blend, the PURE , UNDILUTED BIODIESEL (= the 100 % ) would have to cost...

(new formula now: )

(20 % · ? $ ) + (80 % · 3,6 $ ) = (100 % · 59 $ )

Ergo:

(0,2 · x) + (0,8 · 3,6) = (1 · 59)

(0,2 · x) + 2,88 = 59

0,2 · x = 59 – 2,88

0,2 · x = 56,12

x = 56,12 : 0,2

x = 280,6

280,6 $ / gallon!!!

Mathematically speaking, only a price of 280,6 $ / gallon (for the 20 % of biodiesel) manages to increase the low price of the remaining 80 % of kerosene from 3,6 $ / gallon to 59 $ / gallon!!!

There is simply no other way, whatever other calculating formulas you use!

But does pure biodiesel really cost 280,6 $ / gallon? 280,6 $ for each gallon of PURE biodiesel, made of literally ROTTEN W-A-S-T-E ??? Is the raw matter for its production, U.S. American WASTE , really so unpayably precious? And the fat-based generals didn't even question this price for pure, undiluted biodiesel once when they went on to mix 20 % of it with 80 % of their dirt-cheap kerosene??? It never crossed their minds that it could contain dissolved gold or diamond dust or caviar or what, or wonder for what other reason civilian biodiesel (pure or mixed) is so incredibly cheaper than military biofuel??? And this experiment was even meant as a precautionary exercise against higher, future fuel prices?!

With such an E-X-T-R-E-M-E price for biodiesel, wouldn't it be much more profitable for the generals to hire some illegal aliens to sit in their planes and tanks and to invest their budgets only in biodiesel plantations?

“The price of biodiesel in the United States came down from an average $3.50 per US gallon ($0.92/l) in 1997 to $1.85 per US gallon ($0.49/l) in 2002.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...

As you see: PURE , undiluted biodiesel costs only 1,85 $ / gallon!!! That's almost HALF AS EXPENSIVE as dirt-cheap, pure kerosene, therefore any subsequent mixes with kerosene should even COST L-E-S-S THAN 3,6 $ , INSTEAD OF RISING from 3,6 $ to 59 $ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The price of that mix should have GONE DOWN , NOT GONE UP , as it incomprehensibly did!!!

For this estimated price (280,6 $) of ANYTHING per gallon, you can even fill your car trunk with propane bottles or welder bottles full of hydrogen or acetylene, and other, even more explosive liquids and gases, whose combustion in any engine yields infinitely more energy than one gallon of that ridiculously expensive “biodiesel” does! If I knew which telephone number to dial, I would even have rung N.A.S.A. or Rockwell to ask them how much they paid in the past for one gallon of solid rocket fuel in the Space Shuttle's two lateral, giant booster rockets – it can't possibly have been as much as 280,6 $ / gallon, and 1 gallon of that (cheaper) rocket fuel ALSO unleashes much more power in jet engines than 1 gallon of 100 % pure biodiesel ever will (or any other biofuel mix on Earth) ! And so on.

Obviously, there is N-O-O imaginable, minimally acceptable justification to pay anyone 280,6 $ / gallon instead of 1,85 $ / gallon for raw, pure, undiluted biodiesel! Not when civilians pay 1,85 $ / gallon for (100 % pure) biodiesel at the old gas station right on the other side of that airfield fence.

Crime, she said! And I always thought that such chaplinesque cases of fraud and corruption only happened in banana republics that already went completely bananas...

Let's see which other incongruencies I discover when I wake up tomorrow.

freefallingbomb
freefallingbomb

 

(Continuation)

Part 2 / 3

But does pure biodiesel really cost 280,6 $ / gallon? 280,6 $ for each gallon of PURE biodiesel, made of literally ROTTEN W-A-S-T-E ??? Is the raw matter for its production, U.S. American WASTE , really so unpayably precious? And the fat-based generals didn't even question this price for pure, undiluted biodiesel once when they went on to mix 20 % of it with 80 % of their dirt-cheap kerosene??? It never crossed their minds that it could contain dissolved gold or diamond dust or caviar or what, or wonder for what other reason civilian biodiesel (pure or mixed) is so incredibly cheaper than military biofuel??? And this experiment was even meant as a precautionary exercise against higher, future fuel prices?!

With such an E-X-T-R-E-M-E price for biodiesel, wouldn't it be much more profitable for the generals to hire some illegal aliens to sit in their planes and tanks and to invest their budgets only in biodiesel plantations?

“The price of biodiesel in the United States came down from an average $3.50 per US gallon ($0.92/l) in 1997 to $1.85 per US gallon ($0.49/l) in 2002.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...

As you see: PURE , undiluted biodiesel costs only 1,85 $ / gallon!!! That's almost HALF AS EXPENSIVE as dirt-cheap, pure kerosene, therefore any subsequent mixes with kerosene should even COST L-E-S-S THAN 3,6 $ , INSTEAD OF RISING from 3,6 $ to 59 $ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The price of that mix should have GONE DOWN , NOT GONE UP , as it incomprehensibly did!!!

(Continued)

freefallingbomb
freefallingbomb

 (Continuation)

Part 2 / 2

But does pure biodiesel really cost 280,6 $ / gallon? 280,6 $ for each gallon of PURE biodiesel, made of literally ROTTEN W-A-S-T-E ??? Is the raw matter for its production, U.S. American WASTE , really so unpayably precious? And the fat-based generals didn't even question this price for pure, undiluted biodiesel once when they went on to mix 20 % of it with 80 % of their dirt-cheap kerosene??? It never crossed their minds that it could contain dissolved gold or diamond dust or caviar or what, or wonder for what other reason civilian biodiesel (pure or mixed) is so incredibly cheaper than military biofuel??? And this experiment was even meant as a precautionary exercise against higher, future fuel prices?!

With such an E-X-T-R-E-M-E price for biodiesel, wouldn't it be much more profitable for the generals to hire some illegal aliens to sit in their planes and tanks and to invest their budgets only in biodiesel plantations?

“The price of biodiesel in the United States came down from an average $3.50 per US gallon ($0.92/l) in 1997 to $1.85 per US gallon ($0.49/l) in 2002.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...

As you see: PURE , undiluted biodiesel costs only 1,85 $ / gallon!!! That's almost HALF AS EXPENSIVE as dirt-cheap, pure kerosene, therefore any subsequent mixes with kerosene should even COST L-E-S-S THAN 3,6 $ , INSTEAD OF RISING from 3,6 $ to 59 $ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The price of that mix should have GONE DOWN , NOT GONE UP , as it incomprehensibly did!!!

For this estimated price (280,6 $) of ANYTHING per gallon, you can even fill your car trunk with propane bottles or welder bottles full of hydrogen or acetylene, and other, even more explosive liquids and gases, whose combustion in any engine yields infinitely more energy than one gallon of that ridiculously expensive “biodiesel” does! If I knew which telephone number to dial, I would even have rung N.A.S.A. or Rockwell to ask them how much they paid in the past for one gallon of solid rocket fuel in the Space Shuttle's two lateral, giant booster rockets – it can't possibly have been as much as 280,6 $ / gallon, and 1 gallon of that (cheaper) rocket fuel ALSO unleashes much more power in jet engines than 1 gallon of 100 % pure biodiesel ever will (or any other biofuel mix on Earth) ! And so on.

Obviously, there is N-O-O imaginable, minimally acceptable justification to pay anyone 280,6 $ / gallon instead of 1,85 $ / gallon for raw, pure, undiluted biodiesel! Not when civilians pay 1,85 $ / gallon for (100 % pure) biodiesel at the old gas station right on the other side of that airfield fence.

Crime, she said! And I always thought that such chaplinesque cases of fraud and corruption only happened in banana republics that already went completely bananas...

Let's see which other incongruencies I discover when I wake up tomorrow.

freefallingbomb
freefallingbomb

 I've been sleeping only one day over this topic and my perception of the REAL dimension of this scandal only got clearer.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

To begin with, let's follow through this clarifying logical sequence once:

1) Biofuel is not biodiesel.

2) Biofuel is always a blend of TWO different, organic fuel types:

1 x part of fossile fuel (commonly called “oil”) + 1 x part of fat-based fuel (called “biodiesel”).

3) In the civilian world, this mix (called “biofuel”) = petrodiesel + biodiesel.

4) In the military aviation world, this mix (called “biofuel”, too) = kerosene + biodiesel.

So far, so good? No objections? Ok, more:

5) The fuel which these U.S. warplanes used during their experiment

– was a kerosene-biodiesel M-I-X . At least according to the word “biofuel” incessantly used in the article above, and in its links, too.

– So: It was  N-O-T  PURE kerosene (= the same, cheap aviation fuel used on every other, normal flying day, sometimes also called “avgas”),

– but it was  N-O-T  PURE , undiluted biodiesel either.

Remember this, it was a MIX they used, called “biofuel”.

6) One gallon of pure, UNDILUTED kerosene costs only 3,6 $ .

Official proof of that information (taken from the first link in “Battleland”'s article above) : http://www.reuters.com/article...

7) But each single gallon of that kerosene-biodiesel-MIX used in the experiment costs 59 $ (= each one gallon of THE  M-I-X  = NOT of the undiluted kerosene and NOT of the undiluted biodiesel either) !

8) 3,6 $ (= pure kerosene's price / gallon) is MUCH cheaper than 59 $ (= that kerosene-biodiesel MIX's price / gallon used in the experiment). Agreed?

9) Final conclusion: Whatever biodiesel got splashed into the cheap, 3,6-$-/-gallon-kerosene must have been ( MUCH ! ) more expensive than 3,6 $ / gallon, to make the resulting biofuel MIX's price / gallon shoot up from 3,6 $ to a stupefying 59 $, right?

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

After this brief introduction, let me make a quick detour to an apparently secondary, technical and mathematical, completely unassuming detail that will in fact reveal you the most disturbing part of this topic: What PERCENTAGES did the U.S. Airforce use in its experimental biofuel blend for warplanes? (Trust me, in reality this is NOT about “chemistry”)

Let's assume – just for conversation's purpose – that the U.S. Airforce's blend was exactly 50 % – 50 % : Each 1 x gallon of normal aviation fuel (= pure kerosene) got mixed with 1 x gallon of pure biodiesel. “50–50”.

If normal aviation fuel (pure kerosene) costs only 3,6 $ / gallon, but the final price of that biofuel mix was a whopping 59 $ / gallon, then the OTHER HALF of that fuel blend (= the raw, pure, undiluted biodiesel) would have to cost almost twice as much: It would have to cost...

(the quickest formula for this simple case: )

( [59 – 3,6] x 2 = )

110,8 $ / gallon! But waaait, it gets far worse...

I must admit that I don't know which exact proportions the U.S. Airforce chose for its experimental kerosene-biodiesel blend, but I do know that the biofuel mix for most civilian, U.S. American land vehicles (called “B20”) isn't composed of 50 % petrodiesel amp; 50 % biodiesel, but of 80 % petrodiesel amp; O-N-L-Y 20 % biodiesel.

So, let's suppose again that that “alternative” military jet fuel consists similarly of

1) 80 % pure, cheap kerosene

and only of

2) 20 % pure, expensive biodiesel,

just like the biofuel blend for civilian U.S. vehicles does.

In this second, more realistic case, where biodiesel constitutes only 20 % = ONE FIFTH of the whole biofuel blend, the PURE , UNDILUTED  BIODIESEL (= the 100 % ) would have to cost...

(new formula now: )

(20 % · ? $ ) + (80 % · 3,6 $ ) = (100 % · 59 $ )

Ergo:

(0,2 · x) + (0,8 · 3,6) = (1 · 59)

(0,2 · x) + 2,88 = 59

0,2 · x = 59 – 2,88

0,2 · x = 56,12

x = 56,12 : 0,2

x = 280,6

280,6 $ / gallon!!!

Mathematically speaking, only a price of 280,6 $ / gallon (for the 20 % of biodiesel) manages to increase the low price of the remaining 80 % of kerosene from 3,6 $ / gallon to 59 $ / gallon!!!

There is simply no other way, whatever other calculating formulas you use!

But does pure biodiesel really cost 280,6 $ / gallon? 280,6 $ for each gallon of PURE biodiesel, made of literally ROTTEN  W-A-S-T-E ??? Is the raw matter for its production, U.S. American WASTE , really so unpayably precious? And the fat-based generals didn't even question this price for pure, undiluted biodiesel once when they went on to mix 20 % of it with 80 % of their dirt-cheap kerosene??? It never crossed their minds that it could contain dissolved gold or diamond dust or caviar or what, or wonder for what other reason civilian biodiesel (pure or mixed) is so incredibly cheaper than military biofuel??? And this experiment was even meant as a precautionary exercise against higher, future fuel prices?!

With such an E-X-T-R-E-M-E price for biodiesel, wouldn't it be much more profitable for the generals to hire some illegal aliens to sit in their planes and tanks and to invest their budgets only in biodiesel plantations?

“The price of biodiesel in the United States came down from an average $3.50 per US gallon ($0.92/l) in 1997 to $1.85 per US gallon ($0.49/l) in 2002.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...

As you see: PURE , undiluted biodiesel costs only 1,85 $ / gallon!!! That's almost HALF AS EXPENSIVE as dirt-cheap, pure kerosene, therefore any subsequent mixes with kerosene should even COST  L-E-S-S  THAN  3,6 $ , INSTEAD OF RISING from 3,6 $  to  59 $ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The price of that mix should have GONE  DOWN , NOT  GONE  UP , as it incomprehensibly did!!!

For this estimated price (280,6 $) of ANYTHING per gallon, you can even fill your car trunk with propane bottles or welder bottles full of hydrogen or acetylene, and other, even more explosive liquids and gases, whose combustion in any engine yields infinitely more energy than one gallon of that ridiculously expensive “biodiesel” does! If I knew which telephone number to dial, I would even have rung N.A.S.A. or Rockwell to ask them how much they paid in the past for one gallon of solid rocket fuel in the Space Shuttle's two lateral, giant booster rockets – it can't possibly have been as much as 280,6 $ / gallon, and 1 gallon of that (cheaper) rocket fuel ALSO unleashes much more power in jet engines than 1 gallon of 100 % pure biodiesel ever will (or any other biofuel mix on Earth) ! And so on.

Obviously, there is N-O-O imaginable, minimally acceptable justification to pay anyone 280,6 $ / gallon instead of 1,85 $ / gallon for raw, pure, undiluted biodiesel! Not when civilians pay 1,85 $ / gallon for (100 % pure) biodiesel at the old gas station right on the other side of that airfield fence.

Crime, she said! And I always thought that such chaplinesque cases of fraud and corruption only happened in banana republics that already went completely bananas...

Let's see which other incongruencies I discover when I wake up tomorrow.